(link some papers on reusability; not an endorsement--needs some looking into) |
m (Colby Russell moved page Talk:Packages to Talk:Reusability: "package" is ambiguous, and the definition used here is different from the way "package" is meant in SDIPD) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 11:46, 5 December 2022
Related [1] --crussell 13:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Also Kernighan on code size and inscrutability [2] --crussell 19:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
(NB: in previous section of the interview, without making the connection explicit, bwk outlines a similar problem with breakage in Rust. --crussell 19:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC))
Reusability generally:
- [3]
- [4]
- [5] 70.115.145.22 19:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)