This is not JavaScript: Difference between revisions

From triplescripts.org wiki
Content added Content deleted
(mention influence of Go and Smalltalk)
(→‎See also: rm HN link and add link to NOT)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The triple script dialect superficially resembles JS. In fact, the dialect is specifically crafted so that the output of the trplkt compiler passes as syntactically valid by any compliant ECMA-262 parser.
The triple script dialect superficially resembles JS. In fact, the dialect is specifically crafted so that the output of the trplkt compiler passes as syntactically valid (even if not semantically coherent) by any compliant ECMA-262 parser.


But let it be a mantra for the work of the triplescripts.org group: '''This is not JavaScript'''.
But let it be a mantra for the work of the triplescripts.org group: '''This is not JavaScript'''.


Although superficially resembling JS for the reasons described, the triple script dialect is most strongly inspired by the pragmatics of Go and the [[gestalt of Smalltalk]].
Although superficially resembling JS for the reasons described, the triple script dialect is most strongly inspired by the pragmatics of Go while attempting to retain the [[gestalt of Smalltalk]] where possible.

== See also ==
* [[NOT]]

Latest revision as of 10:21, 5 December 2023

The triple script dialect superficially resembles JS. In fact, the dialect is specifically crafted so that the output of the trplkt compiler passes as syntactically valid (even if not semantically coherent) by any compliant ECMA-262 parser.

But let it be a mantra for the work of the triplescripts.org group: This is not JavaScript.

Although superficially resembling JS for the reasons described, the triple script dialect is most strongly inspired by the pragmatics of Go while attempting to retain the gestalt of Smalltalk where possible.

See also[edit]

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.