User talk:Colby Russell/Draft:The case for accepting the W3C–WHATWG hypertext system as the universal medium, aka "Browsers, builds, and burdens": Difference between revisions

Discussion page of User:Colby Russell/Draft:The case for accepting the W3C–WHATWG hypertext system as the universal medium, aka "Browsers, builds, and burdens"
Content added Content deleted
("Crafting Interpreters" + Moonchild as examples)
(Seymour and Python as an anti-example)
Line 6: Line 6:
* Use Bob Nystrom's ad hoc, quasi-literate programming tools described in 'Crafting "Crafting Interpreters"' <http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2020/04/05/crafting-crafting-interpreters/> to make the case for 1
* Use Bob Nystrom's ad hoc, quasi-literate programming tools described in 'Crafting "Crafting Interpreters"' <http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2020/04/05/crafting-crafting-interpreters/> to make the case for 1
* Use the Moonchild editor <https://harc.github.io/moonchild/> to make the case for 2
* Use the Moonchild editor <https://harc.github.io/moonchild/> to make the case for 2
** Use the Seymour paper ("we plan to adapt Seymour to use Python") as an example of how not to approach this <https://harc.github.io/seymour-live2017/>

Revision as of 23:28, 29 July 2020

1. Recognizing executable programs as a subset of hypermedia

2. Acknowledging the circumstances of our predicament (or: constraints are always a consideration in an engineering problem)

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.